DIGITAL LIBRARIES, OPEN ACCESS AND REUSE
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The rapid development of new technologies has resulted in all types of libraries being able to create their own digital collections. In addition to the universal availability of information, the main task of digital libraries is to collect, store and present cultural material. Given that digital libraries in Montenegro mainly operate within public cultural institutions, their way of work has succumbed to an outdated concept that results in passivity. This means they focus on collection and storage, while presentation is rarely, if ever, present. Nowadays, culture is treated as a part of the economy – within the cultural and creative industries – but cultural heritage remains unrecognized as a socio-economic resource. Modern technologies and new art theories have combined and are taking a turn by directly involving databases in the creative process. Using various examples of good practices within existing projects and platforms, it is possible to define the conditions for the reuse of digitized cultural heritage, as well as the direction in which policies and tools should be designed to achieve greater visibility. Cultural heritage can become a creative and economic resource only with Open Access, and with an insistence on quality content and metadata. Digitization and reuse of materials require institutions to redesign their pages, providing more metadata that includes narrative descriptions as well as their origins. When this type of metadata is available, the possibilities for further use expand, as it enables various interpretations, translations, and modes of application. Based on several successful projects and their results, it is easy to conclude that there are different ways to open collections and involve the local community, so that economic sectors become connected with digital heritage. The inclusion of digitized heritage in cultural tourism development projects would enable this industry to focus on smart tourism, which entails the inclusion of information technology in the creation of innovative tools for tourism development. Cultural and creative industries are already developed economic sectors in most Western countries, while in developing countries they are not even recognized as an independent sector with defined strategies. The inclusion of cultural heritage and digital collections in the development of these industries, in the spirit of modern world trends in the field of digitization, has come to the fore as the correct way to preserve and present traditions and materials of heritage institutions and to include them in the economy and education.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
How to Cite
References
- Barthes, R. 1977. Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
- Compendium of Best Practices: „2019 & 2020 European Capital of Smart Tourism Competitions“ (European Commission, 2020).
- Guidance on the Structure, Content, and Application of Metadata Records for Digital Resources and Collections. Report of the IFLA Cataloguing Section Working Group on the Use of Metadata Schemas. Draf-for Worldwide Review 27 October, 2002. IFLA, 2003.
- Horkhajmer, M., Adorno, T. V. 1974. Dijalektika prosvjetiteljstva: Filozofijski fragmenti. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša.
- International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers [5], Ernst & Young [5], UNESCO. Director-General, 2009–2017 (Bokova, I. G.) „Cultural times: the first global map of cultural and creative industries“, 2015.
- Izdavački okvir Europeane, knj. 2. 2016. Cetinje: Nacionalna biblioteka Crne Gore „Đurđe Crnojević“.
- Manovič, L. 2015. Jezik novih medija. Beograd: Clio.
- Manro, Dž., Ričards, B. 2015. „Izazov digitalizacije – brendiranje destinacije“. U: Morgan, N., Ričard, A., Prajd, R. (prir.) 2015 Destinacija kao brend. Beograd: Clio.
- Mapiranje i razvoj kulturnih i kreativnih industrija u Crnoj Gori. Podgorica: Institut za preduzetništvo i ekonomski razvoj, 2019.
- Program razvoja kulture 2016–2020. Cetinje: Ministarstvo kulture Crne Gore, 2016.
- Suber, P. 2016. Otvoreni pristup. Beograd: Clio.
- Trifunović, B. 2010. „Zavičajne digitalne biblioteke“. Kultura: časopis za teoriju i sociologiju kulture i kulturnu politiku 129: 155–181.
- Zenit: Internacionalna revija za umetnost i kulturu. Zagreb–Beograd, 1921–1926.
- “About us”. Europeana. https://www.europeana.eu/en/about-us (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- Berlinska deklaracija o otvorenom pristupu znanju u prirodnim i humanističkim naukama, 22. oktobar 2003. https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- Budimpeštanska inicijativa za otvoreni pristup, 14. februar 2002. https://www. budapestopenaccessinitiative.org (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- “Creative Industries Mapping Documents 1998”. Government UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-1998 (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- “Cultural Times: The First Global Map of Cultural and Creative Industries”. UNESDOC Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235710?5=null&queryId=b9443bb6-30a2-4270-a7a8-18ee5d2d242c(pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- Izjava iz Betezde o izdavaštvu u otvorenom pristupu, 20. jun 2003. http://nrs. harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4725199 (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- Izjava o otvorenom pristupu, 18. april 2011. https://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-statement-on-open-access-2011/ (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- McNeilly, N., Popova, M. 2018. Annapaula Freire de Oliveira (Europeana, 2018) #MakeWithEuropeana: MAKERS MARKET PILOT REPORT https://pro.europeana.eu/post/makewitheuropeana-makers-market-pilot-report (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- “Play a Kandinsky”. Google Arts & Culture. https://artsandculture.google.com/experiment/play-a-kandinsky/sgF5ivv105ukhA (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).
- “Zenith: International Review of Arts and Culture”. Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/resource/gdcwdl.wdl_02325/?st=gallery (pristup: 27. 9. 2022).