INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE AND THE ISSUE OF COMMUNITY IDENTITY

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Miloš Matić

Abstract

The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, which was adopted by UNESCO in 2003, as well as other documents related to the preservation of cultural heritage, are declaratively associating the notion of cultural heritage with the identity of communities or groups and proposing that preservation of cultural heritage represents preservation and expression of the identity of persons who recognize certain heritage as their own. This paper is defining the general issues of understanding the relationship between the preservation of intangible cultural heritage and the identity of communities. The thesis is that the issue of identity is embedded in the process of creation of the said Convention, but in such a way that it leaves open possibilities of different interpretations of the concept of intangible cultural heritage, in terms of its use as a means of expressing identity. The basic ways of applying the convention and its instruments are discussed from the aspect that within the idea of cultural diversity they may produce cultural parochialism, from which separations arise between communities instead of the intended unification and mutual tolerance of differences. One particularly problematic aspect is cultural reductionism, which leaves the possibility of creating artificial identities of communities.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE AND THE ISSUE OF COMMUNITY IDENTITY. (2021). Limes-plus, 18(2-3), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.69899/limes-plus211823205m

How to Cite

INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE AND THE ISSUE OF COMMUNITY IDENTITY. (2021). Limes-plus, 18(2-3), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.69899/limes-plus211823205m

References

  1. Aikawa, Noriko. 2004. „An Historical Overview of the Preparation of the UNESCO International Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage“. Museum International 56 (1–2): 137–149.
  2. Aykan, Bahar. 2014. „Whose Tradition, Whose Identity? The Politics of Constructing ’Nevruz’ as Intangible Heritage in Turkey“. European Journal of Turkish Studies 19.
  3. Alivizatou, Marilena. 2008. „Contextualising Intangible Cultural Heritage in Heritage Studies and Museology“. International Journal of Intangible Heritage 3: 43–54.
  4. Arizpe, Lourdes. 2004. „Intangible Cultural Heritage, Diversity and Coherence“. Museum International 56 (1–2): 130–136.
  5. Blekburn, Sajmon. 1999. Oksfordski filozofski rečnik. Novi Sad: Svetovi.
  6. Brown, Michael F. 2005. „Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage“. International Journal of Cultural Property 12: 40–61.
  7. Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. 2001. „Between Universalism and Relativism: a Critique of the UNESCO concept of culture“. Jane K. Cowman, Marie
  8. Bénédicte Dembour and Richard A. Wilson (ed.), Culture and right, 127– 148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Ingold, T. (ed). 1996. Key Debates in Anthropology. London: Routledge.
  10. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. 2004. „Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production“. Museum International 56 (1–2): 52–65.
  11. Ковачевић, Иван (ур.). 1985. О крсном имену. Београд: Просвета.
  12. Kulenović, Nina. 2017. Objašnjenje u antropologiji, Polemike. Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofski fakultet Univerzitet u Beogradu, Dosije.
  13. Матић, Милош. 2011. „Концептуализација културе у херитолошкој парадигми“. Антропологија 11 (1): 117–142.
  14. Матић, Милош. 2015. „Економија породичне славе“. Гласник Етнографског музеја 79: 119–140.
  15. Миленковић, Милош. 2016. Повратак наслеђу. Београд: Одељење за етнологију и антропологију Филозофски факултет Универзитет у Београду, Досије студио
  16. Munjeri, Dawson. 2004: „Tangible and Intangible heritage: From Difference to Convergence“. Museum International 56 (1–2): 12–20.
  17. Rusalić, Dragana. 2009: Making the Intangible Tangible: The New Interface of Cultural Heritage. Beograd: Institute of Ethnography SASA.
  18. Smith, Laurajane. 2015. „Intangible Heritage: A challenge to the authorized heritage discourse?“. Revista d’Etnologia de Catalunya 40: 133–142.
  19. Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Ćuković, Jelena. 2019. Nematerijalno kulturno nasleđe iz antropološke perspektive. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju – Dosije studio.
  21. Izvori
  22. Закон о потврђивању Конвенције о очувању нематеријалног културног наслеђа
  23. Convention Concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO – https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/
  24. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO – https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention
  25. Национални регистар нематеријалног културног наслеђа Србије –www.nkns.rs /cyr/elementi-nkns Register of Best Safeguarding Practices. Paris: UNSCO – https://ich.unesco.org/en/register
  26. Universal Declaration of Human Rights – https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.