THE FORGOTTEN CONTROVERSY: EVIDENCE FOR A WORLD OF ALTERNATIVE VALUES

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Isidora Jarić
Nataša Jovanović Ajzenhamer

Abstract

The paper discuss the forgotten controversy from the history of sociological theory between two eminent sociologists, Marianne Weber and Georg Simmel, about the position of women in German society (and educational system) in early 20th century. The authors offer new interpretation of the controversy embeded into societal context of: (a) German society in late 19th and early 20th century, (b) first wave feminisim in Germany, and (c) individual habitus of its protagonists. The interpretation shows that inspite of the fact that Weber and Simmel confront their opinions about Simmel’s hypothesis that women should create a different, independent and alternative cultural system (subjective culture) as a counterpoint to dominant male objective culture, they both made an attempt to conteptualize reality that will be constructed on alternative value systems. However, these alter realities were limited by the academic, educational and political experiences of their creators, as well as their gender and class belonging.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
THE FORGOTTEN CONTROVERSY: EVIDENCE FOR A WORLD OF ALTERNATIVE VALUES. (2023). Limes-plus, 17(2), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.69899/limes-plus20172009j

How to Cite

THE FORGOTTEN CONTROVERSY: EVIDENCE FOR A WORLD OF ALTERNATIVE VALUES. (2023). Limes-plus, 17(2), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.69899/limes-plus20172009j

References

  1. Albisetti, J. 1985. „The Reform of Female Education in Prussia, 1899-1908: A Study in Compromise and Containment.“ German Studies Review 8(1): 11–41.
  2. Apple, M. W. 1991. Ideology and Curriculum. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
  3. Becker, H. 1951. Max Weber, Assassination, and German Guilt An Interview with Marianne Weber.“ The American Journal of Economy and Sociology 10(4): 401–405.
  4. Crenshaw K. 1991. “Mapping the Margines: Intersectionallity, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Color”. Stenford Law Review, Vol 43(6): pp. 1241-1299.
  5. Guido D. 2010. The German League for the Prevention of Women’s Emancipation: Antifeminism in Germany, 1912–1920. New York: Peter Lang
  6. Evans R. 1976. The Feminist Movement in Germany 1894–1933. London: SAGE Publications.
  7. Glover D. and Kaplan C. 2000. Genders. London and New York: Routledge.
  8. Hajns F. 2011. Uvod u Maksa Vebera. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
  9. Haraway D. (2002): “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century”, translation published in Andjelković B. (ed), Uvod u feminističke teorije slike [Introduction to Feminist Theories of Image], Belgrade, pp. 309-347
  10. Hull, I. 2004. “Military culture, Wilhelm II, and the end of the monarchy in the First World War.” In The Kaiser – New Research on Wilhelm II’s role in Imperial Germany., edited by Annika Mombauer & Wilhem Deist, pages 235-258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Jovanović Ajzenhamer, N. 2019a. Veberovo shvatanje značaja ratničkog ethosa za nastanak i razvoj islama. Doktorska disertacija. Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.
  12. Jovanović Ajzenhamer, N, 2019b. „Skidanje balasta religije sa religioznosti: Zimelov teorijski i epistemološki doprinos savremenoj religiološkoj misli.“ Etnoantropološki problemi 14(3): 971–997.
  13. Kozer, L. 2008. „Georg Zimel: Kratka biografija.“ In Georg Zimel 1858–2008, edited by Dušan Marinković, 15–21. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
  14. Lengermann, Madoo P, and J. Niebrugge-Brantley. 1998. „Marianne Weber (1870–1954): A Woman-Centered Sociology.“ In The Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory, 1830-1930: a Text/reader, editor by Patricia Madoo Lengermann and Gillian Niebrugge, 193-228. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  15. Mazón, P. 2003. Gender and the Modern Research University: The Admission of Women to German Higher Education, 1865–1914. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  16. Molnar, A. 2014. „Predgovor.“ In Država: racionalna ustanova države i moderne političke partije i parlamenti: sociologija države, Maks Veber, 9–30. Novi Sad: Meditterran Pubslishing.
  17. Mommsen, W. 2000. „Max Weber’s ’Grand Sociology’: The Origins and Composition of Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Soziologie.“ History and Theory 39(3): 364–383.
  18. Nipperdey, T and D. Nolan . 1996. Germany from Napoleon to Bismarck 1800–1866. New Yersey: Princeton University Press.
  19. Offe, C. 2005. Reflections on America: Tocqueville, Weber and Adorno in the United States. Cambridge: Polity.
  20. Phillips, B.S. 1990. “Simmel, Individuality, and Fundamental Change.” In: Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology, editor by Kaern M., Phillips B. S. and Cohen R. S.
  21. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 119:: 259-281. Springer, Dordrecht Scott J. W. 1991. „The Evidence of Experience.” Critical Inquiry 17(4): 773-797.
  22. Šic, A. 1998. „O višestrukim realnostima.“ In Interpretativna sociologija, edited by Ivana Spasić, 87–108. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
  23. Tenbruck, F. 1980. „The Problem of thematic unity in the works of Max Weber.“ British Journal of Sociology 31(3): 316–351.
  24. Van Vucht, T. L. 1991. “Women and Objective Culture: Georg Simmel and Marianne Weber.“ Theory, Culture & Society: Special Issue on Georg Simmel 8(3): 203–218.
  25. Watier, P. 1998. “Georg Simmel”. In Key Sociological Thinkers, edited by R. Stones. 71-83. London: Palgrave.
  26. Weber, M. 1919. „Die Frau und die objektive Kultur.“ In Frauenfrage and Frauengedanke Marianne, eds. Weber. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
  27. Wette, W. 2008. Militarismus in Deutschland. Geschichte einer kriegerischen Kultur. Darmstadt: Primus Verlag.
  28. Witz, A. 2001. “Georg Simmel and the Masculinity of Modernity.” Journal of Classical Sociology 1(3): 353 – 370.
  29. Wobbe, T 1999. „Elective Affinities: Georg Simmel and Marianne Weber on Differentiation and Individuation.“ paper presented to ISA World Congress, Montreal.
  30. Young, B. 1999. Triumph of the Fatherland: German Unification and the Marginalization of Women. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  31. Zimel, G. 2008. „Ženska i muška kultura. Ženska kultura.“ UIn Georg Zimel 1858–2008, edited by D. Marinković, 291–327. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.