THE ROLE OF DIALOGUE IN HYBRID EDUCATION
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The dialogical approach to teaching is a methodological
framework that emphasizes the active role of students and teachers in the learning process, offering a comprehensive and interactive method of instruction. This approach is particularly relevant in the era of technological advancement, which significantly transforms traditional educational models. Hybrid classrooms provide a dynamic educational environment that combines face-to-face instruction with online learning methods. This paper examines how dialogue contributes to creating an inclusive learning environment that encourages active participation from all students, regardless of their language skills or cultural backgrounds. The study explores the key components and implications of hybrid classrooms in contemporary education, investigates the theoretical foundations of hybrid learning, and highlights the role of integrating face-to-face interaction with digital technologies to create an interactive and adaptable educational setting. Additionally, the paper considers the practical application of hybrid classrooms, including the use of learning management systems, video conferencing platforms, and other digital tools to facilitate communication, collaboration, and content delivery. It also addresses the challenges and opportunities associated with hybrid learning, such as ensuring equity and accessibility for all students, fostering active engagement, and strengthening the sense of community in both physical and virtual spaces. The need for ongoing adaptation to new learning patterns is identified as a key issue that necessitates the promotion and development of new learning models. This paper employs an interdisciplinary approach to contribute to a deeper understanding of hybrid classrooms and provides insights into effective strategies for designing and implementing hybrid educational experiences across various educational settings.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
How to Cite
References
- Altbach, P. (2006). The dilemmas of ranking. International Higher Education, 42.
- Altiser, L. (2009). Ideologija i državni ideološki aparati (Beleške za istraživanje). Karpos.
- Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. https://doi. org/10.3102/00346543074003379.
- Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 51-58.
- Bizonova, Z., & Ranc, D. (2007). Model driven LMS platform integration. In Proceedings of the Third Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications (AICT’07), Morne, Mauritius, 13–19 May 2007.
- Bradley, V. (2020). Learning management system (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4, 68. https:// doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36
- Callaghan, M., McPhail, J., & Yau, O. H. M. (1995). Dimensions of a relationship marketing orientation: An empirical exposition. In Proceedings of the Seventh Biannual World Marketing Congress, Vol. VII‒II, Melbourne.
- Callahan, E. (2006). Cultural similarities and differences in the design of university web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00012.x
- Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco: Kaufmann.
- Gone, Ž. (1998). Obrazovanje i mediji. Beograd: Clio.
- Habermas, J. (1987). The idea of the university: Learning processes. New German Critique, 41, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
- Hrastinski, S., & Keller, C. (2007). Computer-mediated communication in education: A review of recent research. Educational Media International, 44(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980600922746
- Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Oxford and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
- Jaspers, K. (1987). Filozofska autobiografija. Novi Sad: Bratstvo i jedinstvo.
- Jung, S., & Huh, J. H. (2019). An efficient LMS platform and its test bed. Electronics, 8(2), 154.
- Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In J. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, R. L. Martens, & P. Dillenbourg (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686-694.
- Mahn, H. (2003). Periods in child development: Vygotsky’s perspective. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge University Press.
- Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Montessori Jr, M. M. (1976). Education for human development: Understanding Montessori. Schocken Books.
- Rudestam, K. E., & Schoenholtz-Read, J. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of online learning: Innovations in higher education and corporate training. Sage Publications.
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. London: Routledge.